However, a handful of changes to government surveillance powers in Titles II and V of the Act were widely debated. Many of its provisions were relatively noncontroversial, including increasing communication among different federal agencies in foreign intelligence gathering and granting greater regulatory powers to combat foreign money laundering and terrorism and shore up border security. ![]() The act contained 10 titles, or sections, that covered hundreds of pages of text and amended at least 15 existing statutes. The USA PATRIOT Act’s name is an acronym for “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism”. A fourth plane crashed into a field in Pennsylvania after the passengers fought back. In the background remains the question whether American citizens should trade some of their freedom and privacy for more safety and security.Īl-Qaeda terrorists crashed planes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon (pictured here) on September 11, 2001. Almost two decades after its initial passage, the law, including its most controversial provisions, is still in effect, having been renewed repeatedly by successive administrations and Congresses controlled by both parties. Critics argued it gave the government too much power to pry into the private lives of citizens and violated constitutional liberties. Supporters said the law would make America safer. Bush to declare a War on Terror and Congress to hastily pass the USA PATRIOT Act 45 days later. The September 11, 2001, terrorist attack on the United States led President George W. Military Intervention in Afghanistan Decision Point the Does the Threat of Terrorism Justify Increased Surveillance? Point-Counterpoint the Was the Invasion of Iraq Justified? Point-Counterpoint and the Security, Liberty, and the USA PATRIOT Act Lesson. Getty Images special correspondent John Moore reported that, breaking from the norm under previous presidents, the media received “zero access” to border operations.Use this narrative after covering 9/11 to discuss the post-9/11 United States and the implications for domestic and foreign policy. The press has been stonewalled by the Biden administration in other regards as well, with news organizations being denied access to border facilities where immigrants are housed and processed. According to NBC, this gag order is not the result of an official memo, leaving no paper trail, with the restrictions being communicated verbally. ![]() These restrictions include requiring all press inquiries to be approved by the Border Patrol press office in Washington, D.C., and forbidding any press requests for ride-alongs at the southern border. ![]() While what constitutes a “gag order” may be debated, the posts are based on real reporting: According to NBC, current and former Customs and Border Protection officials they’ve spken to have stated that the White House has cracked down on what information they’re allowed to share with the press. Customs and Border Protection from giving interviews unless they are arranged through the White House. ![]() Viral Facebook posts claim that the Biden administration has issued a “gag order” to prevent the U.S.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |